Sunday, November 25, 2007

purpose

i think the single most talked about topic within my circle of friends (not counting sex) is the question of what to do with the rest of our lives. i've pondered some options and will, of course, present them in list form.

...........................................

1) get married, get a salaried job(hopefully one you enjoy), work on buying a house, have kids, become member of local church, attend conferences and serve in various ministries, pick up a couple interesting hobbies.

when i look at the majority of christians, that's what they do. for non-christians, you can just subtract the church stuff and it's the same. it's not necessarily bad to conduct the rest of your life this way (if it was, i suppose less people would do it) but i think it can easily become a rut for some people. type employment is key here, because the job needs to be something you actually enjoy doing in order for this to be a viable option. i would say my parents are living this life for the most part, and they both enjoy what they do to an extent.

this is definitely the route the world pressures people to take, and on some level, the church also applies that pressure. stable families with steady incomes and free time on the weekends is great for the church - they get nice tithe checks and people to staff their various programs. 90% of your congregation or non-christian population sample is going to fall in this category, with some having enjoyable employment and good family situations and some not.

2) attempt to do something tough that you really care about, despite the road being difficult. i think a lot of artists struggle with this - art doesn't always pay the bills. to get paid one usually has to offer some kind of artistic compromise to appeal to a broader audience, which undermines the ethos behind one's art. being a musician, for instance, requires being financially unstable to a large degree, and also mandates a lot of travel and odd hours. it makes option no. 1 all but impossible, and the world doesn't exactly make the path easy. it's the road less traveled.

i suppose artists aren't the only ones that struggle with this in a world that doesn't appreciate or reward their effort, but art is the closest thing to me that fits this category. mike kinsella (owen) has a song called "one of these days" that goes and one of these days / i'll get a real job / one that actually pays / like my dad had / one of these days i'll give up / and give in to the man. i think that sums up the dilemma inherent in working for ourselves and doing things we love, especially as artists. it's tough and the temptation is always there to give up.

3) go into either full mother teresa mode, or start "bobbert t. hoohoojiggly international ministries" and write more books about the anointing and the holy spirit that nobody reads. you'll forgive me if i'm a bit sarcastic about this one, but i think modern charismatic christians hold up organizational ministry as the holy grail which we should all attain to. somehow bill hybels and brian houston are on another plane, another level, than us "common folk" and if some of us work hard enough we can be like them, maybe one day!

if i hear one more sod talk about seeing a hundred thousand people in a stadium when they can't even preach a sermon with any academically or theologically sound ideas in it for twenty minutes, i'm going to scream. i'm over organized ministry for the most part - a lot of it seems spiritually masturbatory to me. i get so much more out of a good conversation over a beer with a couple deep-thinking friends it's not even funny.

maybe the anglicans and catholics have it right - you have an hour of ritual every sunday, something that allows you to transcend church and get in contact with the divine. c.s. lewis, in letters to malcolm, said (and i loosely paraphrase) that worship should be habitual in the sense that we don't have to think about it - we can communicate with God directly through it because it's so comfortable and well-worn. that's the point of the Lord's prayer, isn't it? we suffuse the words with our meaning precisely because we know them so well. shouldn't edification within a church setting be somewhat the same? not that worship should be dreary and bland, because we don't serve that kind of God. but i think we need less time in the church and more time out of it.

nevertheless, full-time ministry is an option for a lot of christians, even if the market is glutted and there doesn't seem to be a real spiritual need for it. helping the poor and needy is a much more honorable way to go about it, and for many can be a real calling. but a lot of christians would rather get thousands of people in a meeting under their own banner than go and teach water sterilization techniques to villagers in india. the latter is more needed and (in my opinion) a more valid way of doing full time organized ministry.

...............................................................................................

so what do we do with our lives, then? a lot of people say "follow your calling" but most days i'm not even sure what my calling is. i think maybe the answer is to just pick something you love, and do it no matter what. have good friends and good food and good beer, pray a lot, read some quality literature, and do the things with which you have been tasked. maybe stop listening to everybody else, including me. hah.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I tend to really think on your posts. Like a good conversation I carry around with me and mull it over.
For the most part I agree with what you are saying. I too am OVER ministry-it being a religious way to not get a real job and make a lot of noise and surround yourself with people who think just.like.you. I speak from my own personal observations of good and talented people, rotting in their own gravy. I know you know what i mean. Also, the way that the church snobs its nose at education makes me crazy. Why should the church be exempt from having a high standard for its employees? Charismatics are the worst-someone being anointed and/or called seems to always trump academic excellence.

Where I depart with your thinking a bit is in reference to where you see your future going. T and I discuss this a lot, as we struggle with being artists and having a family and work and church. Our conclusion- We don't really give a fuck what other people deem as average or boring or typical. Corporate America would love for me to want to live a fantasy life of celebrity and endless orgasm. That way, I will constantly be unhappy and buy buy buy. Having a great family is a minimum of a 20 yr. commitment. You speak about it like it's an easy and boring option. It isn't. It is incredibly gratifying difficult and satisfying. I really hate it that it is painted by the current culture as a ball and chain. What the hell am I supposed to be? I mean, what would make you UN-average? Rich and famous? I think that's what most people mean when they say they don't want to live in a rut-they want to be a celebrity and they use a great spiritual buzz word-"influence the world for god." well, to me that's the nastiest rut of all, allowing someone else to set my own standard for success. The world peddles fear and lack and insecurity. My greatest days are when I can turn my back on all that.
Do whatever in the hell you want to. Forget the cliched commercials playing in your head about what you should be doing to NOT be considered lame. That's what keeps you from feeling tied down and miserable.
I hope you are doing well. it seems like your AU experience has really impacted you. Take care.

Anonymous said...

i want it all.

but not in the way that you described - it seems like you're saying that there are walls in between your numbered out posts of "a life lived".

#1 is something that i'm doing. it's not as easy as it's made out to be. if it really were that easy, you think that there would be a higher success rate (i.e. staying married and raising healthy, well balanced kids). this option should really be considered as a minimum 20 year commitment. i don't think that most 20 somethings look at it that way. it's seen as the boring, easy way out. this is simply not true. in every marriage, with children, there are two individuals learning to sacrifice and live for others. as bono once put it "adults, tamed by duty".

#2 is something i'm currently doing too. it is made more difficult by adding #1 to the mix, but not impossible - in fact my problem is other people that think you can't do both. i do 75% of the work in dice fly high, and i've got the most going on outside of that. this option really is about passion, and not the bullshit lie that modern marketing sells (i.e. you deserve to be a rock star, so just drink this drink and play this video game and wear these cloths and since it's labeled rock star you ARE a rock star - i could go on and on regarding your point that the world doesn't appreciate real art and is making it harder and harder to produce anything authentic, but this is your blog... so i'll just emphatically agree.)

#3 is something i want to do from the place of #s 1 and 2. i want my ministry to be relevant and organic. i don't have much else to say other than i agree with your view of organized religion - it's becoming so tainted with the rest of the mindless consumption and general dissatisfaction that is prevalent in every level of western society.

for me it all boils down to doing what i want and not caring what anybody else says it should look like or sound like. god is my source of all direction and inspiration, and he created me as an individual - i can't believe that he would be happy with me if i was trying to be anything else.

Anonymous said...

I'm obviously way behind on reading, or you'd have seen this comment three weeks ago when you posted . . .

Nonetheless . . .

In reference to 'pressures' to follow path #1, and in particular on your observations from #3 of organized religious practice and the seeming hierarchy therein, I agree wholeheartedly - to the point that I've rather unintentionally (though certainly not unknowingly) allowed myself to be ostracized by the organization whose principles I've loved and to which I've ascribed for years. I was quite amazed what shaking off the mantle of expectation in favour of admitting my humanity, speaking my own piece rather than parroting the jargon, and even openly admitting my error with regard to championing the tenets of modern religiosity (which is still as much religion as the practices of the temple priests in Jesus' time) accomplished on personal and spiritual fronts.

Personally, it immediately made apparent who were my friends and who were simply fellow practitioners, and it revealed the true nature and motivations of many of those associations. It relieved me of a variety of expectation-and-appearance-induced stress I don't believe God intended for my life.

Spiritually, it liberated me to explore and facilitate the truths made evident within my own heart . . . and the results are astounding. I know more 'unsaved' and 'unchurched' folk than I've known in my life. I'm more tangibly involved, and more positively so, in the actual lives of people whom I was taught to think I was helping in spite of the fact that I was never associating with them due to all the time I spent 'building the church'. I've developed associations with important and influential people within creative industry - people whom would never have approached me had I waited inside the walls of the church for them to find me - people who have the power and position to change things within the entertainment industry rather than just discussing how things should be changed - which again harkens to what Jesus did - organically befriending influential people in all walks of life.

I can't purport to have any greater concept of the specific 'purpose' of my life than I ever have, though I can honestly say that I have more opportunity to see tangible results now, liberated within the creative and 'worldly' community, than I ever have from inside the church. I'm more fulfilled personally and spiritually than ever. Those visible, tangible changes make working toward #2, within the temporarily necessary confines of #1, far more comfortable. In fact, the reality of #2 seems more within reach from here than it ever did before.

As usual, there's my dollar when I'm not even sure you wanted a full two cents.

As for your question of what to do with your life, if the snippets I read here are any indication, you're doing well at present. I wish I'd been as grounded prior to reaching 30 - but then Jesus did 100% of his ministry in the age-space I've been occupying for the last year - the year where I feel the most effective (and the most set-back) to date, so maybe there's something to that . . .